go to The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery official site The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery Online Journal
go to main navigation
go to Home
go to Current Issue
go to Past Issue
go to Article Search
Abstract go to Japanese page English
Vol.37 No.4 2004 April [Table of Contents] [Full text ( PDF 79KB)]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical Study of using Prophylactic Antibiotics and Chemical Preparation for Elective Operation of Colorectal Cancer

Tadashi Hashizume, Ryoichi Nishizawa, Shunji Aizawa, Makoto Yamaya1), Hiroyasu Kobori1), Yasuo Asakura, Kenichi Takahashi2), Itaru Shibasaki and Masaaki Endoh

Department of Surgery, Aomori City Hospital
Department of Surgery II, Hirosaki University1)
Department of Surgery, Akita General City Hospital2)

Introduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is an important measure for preventing postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after colorectal operations. We attempted to confirm the optimal method of using prophylaxis for elective colorectal operations by performing a prospective study between January 1997 and August 2002. Methods: Mechanical preparation was used prior to operation in all cases. Preoperative chemical preparation was used for 0-2 days. Well-conditioned, non-contaminated primary resection cases were randomized into one of two groups in advance. In Arm A, antibiotics were given from just prior to the operation until one day after the operation. In Arm B, antibiotics were given from just prior to the operation until 3 days after the operation. The type of antibiotic was limited to PIPC, CEZ, CTM, or CMZ, administered intravenously. If the operation required more than 4 hours to perform, an additional dose of antibiotics was used. Results: In total, 521 cases were enrolled in the study. The rate of SSI was 5.7% (n=262) in arm A, and 5.4% (n=259) in arm B, and the rate of remote infection (RI) was 6.9% in arm A, and 5% in arm B. No relationship was observed between the duration of prophylaxis and the rate of SSI or RI. In Japan, many surgeons do not use preoperative chemical preparations to prevent superinfections, such as MRSA. However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends using a short period of chemical preparation before surgery. Unlike the results for colonic operation, the SSI controll level after performing a Miles' operation was poor when no chemical preparations were used. We believe that short period of chemical preparation is useful for preventing SSI after lower rectal operations. However, postoperative MRSA colitis or MRSA pneumonia occured only in the group where chemical preparations were given for 2 days. In these cases, an overdose of the chemical preparations may have induced antibiotic resistant bacteria to multiply. Conclusions: We recommend the following standard method of using antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal operations. 1) The required duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for SSI and RI does not appear to differ according to the clinical stage or type of operation that is performed. 2) Using antibiotic prophylaxis from just before the operation to one day after the operation is sufficient to prevent SSI. 3) Short periods of administering chemical preparations are likely to be effective for preventing SSI after lower rectal operations.

Key words
prophylactic antibiotics for colorectal operation, chemical preparation, surgical site infection, remote infection

Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 37: 375-383, 2004

Reprint requests
Tadashi Hashizume Department of Surgery, Aomori City Hospital
1-14-20 Katta, Aomori City, 030-0821 JAPAN

Accepted
November 26, 2003

go to download site To read the PDF file you will need Abobe Reader installed on your computer.
return to the head of this page
back to main navigation
Copyright © The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery