go to The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery official site The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery Online Journal
go to main navigation
go to Home
go to Current Issue
go to Past Issue
go to Article Search
Abstract go to Japanese page English
Vol.36 No.8 2003 August [Table of Contents] [Full text ( PDF 121KB)]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of Omentum Preserving Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Junya Fujita, Yasuo Tsukahara, Kimimasa Ikeda, Kenzo Akagi, Kazuomi Kan, Shinsuke Hata, Yukio Fukushima*, Takashi Shibata, Masashi Kitada and Takashi Shimano

Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital
*Department of Surgery, Yao Municipal Hospital

Background and Aim: The generally accepted standard surgery for advanced gastric cancer in Japan is gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection accompanied by omentobursectomy, but the significance of prophylactic omentobursectomy in survival after gastrectomy remains unproved. Since 1996, we have used gastrectomy preserving the omental bursa for both early and some advanced gastric cancers under a restricted criterion. We retrospectively studied whether surgical removal of the omental bursa improved survival from gastric cancer, and evaluated adverse complications caused by omentobursectomy. Methods: Subjects were 188 T2 or T3 gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy-97 involving omental bursa preserving gastrectomy (OPG) and 91 gastrectomy with resection of omental bursa (OB). We compared surgical stress, postoperative complications, the incidence of surgically induced mechanical ileus, the incidence and pattern of cancer recurrence, and survival between OPG and OB. Results: Operation time, blood loss, and serum amylase on postoperative day (POD) 1 were significantly greater in OB than OPG. The incidence of early postoperative complications was 13.4% in OPG and 20.9% in OB. Among subjects, 11 (12.1%) suffered mechanical ileus in BG, compared to 3 (3.1%) in OPG. No significant difference was seen in the incidence of peritoneal recurrence between groups. Five-year survival in OPG vs OB was 81.3% vs 75.9% in stage IB, 77.8% vs 66.7% in stage II, and 40.0% vs 43.8% in stage IIIA, showing no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: OPG resulted in less surgical stress and fewer postoperative complications with survival similar to OB. These results suggest that omental bursa preserving gastrectomy may be applicable to T2 or T3 advanced gastric cancer patients. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing these 2 procedures is recommended to clarify the clinical contribution of omentobursectomy.

Key words
advanced gastric cancer, omentum preserving gastrectomy, omentoburusectomy, ileus after gastrectomy

Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 36: 1151-1158, 2003

Reprint requests
Junya Fujita Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital 4-14-1, Shibahara-cho, Toyonaka, 560-8565 JAPAN

Accepted
March 26, 2003

go to download site To read the PDF file you will need Abobe Reader installed on your computer.
return to the head of this page
back to main navigation
Copyright © The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery