go to The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery official site The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery Online Journal
go to main navigation
go to Home
go to Current Issue
go to Past Issue
go to Article Search
Abstract go to Japanese page English
Vol.26 No.1 1993 January [Table of Contents] [Full text ( PDF 574KB)]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Jejunal Interposition as a Reconstruction for Radical Distal Gastrectomy

Takahiko Funabiki, Masahiro Ochiai, Hiroshi Amano, Hisashi Yamaguchi, Yoshihisa Marugami, Hiroshi Fukui, Shigeru Hasegawa, Hiroki Imazu, Kazufumi Arai, Kikuo Mori, Kohji Nakamura, Hiroshi Morishita, Atsuschi Shikata

Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine

To compare the postoperative status between Billroth-I anastomosis and jejunal interposition after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, patients were divided, according to the method of surgery, into three groups as follows: 1) extensive nodal dissection and subtotal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (Group A), 2) the same dissection and gastrectomy as Group A but reconstructed by Billroth-I (Group B), 3) no or slight nodal dissection and partial gastrectomy with Billroth-I anastomosis (Group C). Endoscopy was conducted postoperatively and yielded the following results. Bile reflux and remnant gastritis were not seen at all in Group A, while they were obvious in Group B (52.6%, 57.9%, respectively) and in Group C (33.3%, 46.7%). Reflux esophagitis was seen only in Group B and its incidence was 21.1%. Gastro-biliary scintigraphy was conducted to determine RI reflux to the stomach, which was seen in 8.3% of Group A patients and in 40.0% of Group B patients. His angle was calculated from postoperative UGI series and was the smallest in Group A (97°) while it was 133° in Group B and 105° in Group C. Intraluminal pressure of LES was also studied and was 13.5 cm H2O in Group A and 11.8 cm H2O in Group B. Postoperative complaints were investigated by interview. Weight loss, reflux esophagitis and dumping were the highest in Group B (15.6%, 26.7%, 20.0%, respectively) in comparison with Group A (6.4%, 6.3%, 6.3%) and Group C (5.7%, 0%, 0%). Operating time in Group A was about one hour longer than in Group B; however, there was no difference in incidence of anastomotic leakage and of postoperative intestinal obstruction.

Key words
quality of life after distal gastrectomy, Billroth-1 anastomosis, jejunal interposition between remnant stomach and duodenum

Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 26: 26-31, 1993

Reprint requests
Takahiko Funabiki Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine
1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakechou, Toyoake, 470-11 JAPAN

Accepted
September 9, 1992

go to download site To read the PDF file you will need Abobe Reader installed on your computer.
return to the head of this page
back to main navigation
Copyright © The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery